|
|
|
|
윤지선 ( Yun Ji-Seon ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
김은옥 ( Kim Eun-Ok ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
서유선 ( Seo Yu-Sun ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
고은아 ( Koh Eun-Ah ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
이수열 ( Lee Su-Yeol ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
장주희 ( Jang Joo-Hee ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
김한나 ( Kim Han-Nah ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
김연희 ( Kim Yeon-Hee ) - 서울아산병원 간호부
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the current evidence based practice on peripheral venous
catheter replacement.
Methods: After ethics approval, 140 patients (480 intravenous devices) were enrolled in our survey. Data were analyzed by statistical methods such as t-test, frequency analysis, χ2 square, Fisher’s exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using SPSS 21 program.
Results: First, the average number of inserted peripheral venous catheters in the experimental group was 2.7 (3.0 in the control group), the number of days of maintenance of the peripheral venous catheters was 3.0 days (1.8 in the control group), and the maximum maintenance day of the peripheral venous catheter was 8 days. Second, there were no differences in the incidence of phlebitis and bloodstream infection between the two groups. Third, the risk of phlebitis in the experimental group increased sharply from the 6th day after insertion of peripheral venous catheter.
Conclusion: As a result of this study, peripheral venous catheter replacement by clinical signs is recommended, and after 6 days, side effects should be carefully observed. We propose an iterative study on the effect of clinical signs on eripheral venous catheter replacement by expanding the number of patients.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
성인, 말초정맥관, 정맥염
Adult, Catheterization, Peripheral
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|